International Luxemburgist Forum - Foro Luxemburguista Internacional - Forum Luxemburgiste Intl

Forum for those in general agreement with the ideas of Rosa Luxemburg.
Foro para aquellos que tienen un acuerdo general con las ideas de Rosa Luxemburgo.
Forum pour ceux qui ont un accord général avec les idées de Rosa Luxembourg.

Translations

Log in

I forgot my password

Navigation

Latest topics

» Critique Sociale
Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:54 am by Atreides

» QUÉ HACER ANTE UN CUERPO SOCIAL EN DESCOMPOSICIÓN
Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:35 am by francisc

» EL BREXIT EL AUTO GOLPE Y EL YIHADISMO
Mon Aug 01, 2016 11:25 am by francisc

» ¿PUCHERAZO?
Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:45 am by francisc

» 18 de Junio: MANIFESTACIÓN EN DEFENSA DE LO PÚBLICO
Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:42 am by luxemburguista

» Contre la "loi travail", passons à la vitesse supérieure !
Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:03 am by Atreides

» Reunion Publique du CCI
Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:00 pm by rubion

» EL CONTEXTO PRESENTE Y FUTURO DE CATALUNYA DEBE DE BASARSE EN LOS CIUDADANOS Y NO EN PACTOS
Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:05 am by francisc

» LA ENCRUCIJADA SIRIA
Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:25 am by francisc

Who is online?

In total there are 5 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 5 Guests

None


[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 368 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:15 am

Statistics

Our users have posted a total of 4399 messages in 1407 subjects

We have 189 registered users

The newest registered user is sebastianIII


    Dr.Rowna Williams vs.Condems

    Share

    lost

    Number of posts : 151
    Registration date : 2010-12-13

    Dr.Rowna Williams vs.Condems

    Post  lost on Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:22 pm

    although i have my doubts that the New Statesman magazine is even a vague.fuzzy left of center magazine it is undoubtedly significant that Dr.Rown Williams current Archbishop of Canterbury and effectively head of the Anglican/Episcopalain church worrld wide is guest editor this week.

    he is reported as having not simply challenged the current government on its education and social policy but has fundamentally asserted that no one voted for the radical(slash and burn)policies of that government.in my view this more than tacitly says this governmenmt has no madate and i like to hope it ddoes more than imply it has any contract of any kind with the rest of us.it certainly also challenges "lord camerons""wheeze"that"the big society"means anything.

    such a rupture offers an opportunity we should not let go.this may not be working class politics and he is no revolutionary but he is known as a thoughtful man who is clearly capable of seeing and articulating some things for what they are.

    the condems are constantly demonstrating that however much they talk about it,they cannot run this society in their own interests with any success let alone in ours.we need to work for a fundamental "regime change"here.and now.

    we have a better world to win.and even from a religious perspective-"(s)he who wants gods help,must first tie up their camel"or"god helps those who help themselves"

    they rule for themselves and for profit.we must act together for the sake of humanity


      Current date/time is Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:04 am